Usage of e-cigarettes, commonly called e- cigarettes, helps greater than six million smokers in the European Union give up smoking, estimates a new study.
In addition, the researchers found that usage of e-cigarettes has helped greater than nine million Europeans to reduce smoking consumption.
“These are probably the highest rates of quitting smoking and reduction ever observed in this particular large population study,” said principal investigator from the study Konstantinos Farsalinos from University of Patras, Rio, Greece.
For the study, they analysed the info through the 2014 Eurobarometer on smoking and the usage of the reviews for e cigarettes among an agent sample of 27,460 Europeans.
Eurobarometer is actually a survey done by the European Commission, assessing, and others, smoking and e-cigarette use patterns in all 28 member states of the European Union.
The study, accepted for publication inside the journal Addiction, also found that making use e-cigarettes has largely been restricted to smokers, with minimal use by non-smokers.
“The European Union data show that the use of e-cigarettes seems to have a positive effect on public health for 2 major reasons – high smoking cessation and reduction rates are observed, and electronic cigarette use is essentially confined to smokers (current and former), with minimal use by non-smokers,” Farsalinos noted.
There is a lot of controversy over the use of the electronic cigarettes by non-smokers, but researchers appeared reassuring.
Just 1.3 percent of non-smokers reported current utilization of nicotine-containing e cigarettes and .09 percent reported daily use, the research said. A Perth man has lost an attempt to overturn a conviction for selling e-cigarettes in Western Australia.
Vincent Van Heerden, 33, was convicted through the Supreme Court in 2014 of breaching tobacco control laws by selling e-cigarettes online. The landmark case effectively made the sale of the electronic smoking devices illegal in WA. The hjeibx turn fluid into vapour that can be inhaled, and Van Heerden maintained he believed they were a healthy substitute for cigarettes.
He appealed the verdict in the Court of Appeal, but the case was dismissed. Outside of the court, Van Heerden said he was shocked through the decision. “It doesn’t make any sense coming from a sound judgment point of view, from a moral perspective and from the legal perspective. I don’t understand it,” he stated.
“I think society has become done an enormous disservice today. It was a technology that is certainly saving lives all across the globe. “They’ve been shown to be 95 per cent safer than actual tobacco cigarettes.” Van Heerden’s home was raided by Health Department officials in 2011, and he was later responsible for breaching state regulations by selling a product that resembled a cigarette.